Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Madison Brengle vs Madison Sieg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brengle vs Sieg analysis and find out who is favored!
Madison Brengle vs Madison Sieg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Brengle 0 - 0 Sieg
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brengle has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Sieg has won 44.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brengle, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sieg has won 53.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 39.98% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brengle has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sieg has saved 51.72% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brengle has won 53.85% of matches played (W/L 14/ 12), with Sieg winning 56.06% (W/L 37/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brengle has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 340/ 236), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 45/ 45). Sieg has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 50/ 39).
- Player level: In the last year, Brengle has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 11/ 6), where as Sieg has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.92% of matches (W/L 37/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brengle has played against opponents with an average rank of 159.69 while Sieg has played against players with an average rank of 287.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brengle has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sieg has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brengle has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sieg has converted 52.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
259
Rank
35
High
34
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
294
Rank
294
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
56% (556-436)
Career Total W/L
57% (82-62)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
48% (14-15)
$2,482,006
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Madison Brengle
Player
Madison Sieg
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Madison Brengle | Madison Sieg |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 48% (14/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (30/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (280/302) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 90 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:49:14 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 277.69 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 66% (1283/1935) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (725/1283) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (291/652) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 53% (116/219) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (823/1820) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (14/14) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 46% (13/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 93% (14/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 7% (14/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 7% (15/1) |
Madison Brengle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Johanne Svendsen
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
44%
(
16 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
50%
(
24 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Sahaja Yamalapalli
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
17 of
34)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Madison Brengle
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
70 of
105)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
51%
(
43 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
105)
94
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Linda Noskova
Player
Madison Brengle
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
85%
(
39 of
46)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebeka Masarova
Player
Madison Brengle
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Irina Khromacheva
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Xinyu Wang
Player
Madison Brengle
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve %
86%
(
49 of
57)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
43%
(
17 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Su Jeong Jang
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Mary Stoiana
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Madison Sieg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Martyna Kubka
Player
Madison Sieg
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Tamara Kostic
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
67%
(
56 of
83)
1st Serve %
49%
(
48 of
98)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
41 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
49 of
98)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariia Tkacheva
Player
Madison Sieg
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Madison Sieg
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
3 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Daria Yesypchuk
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
86%
(
44 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Merel Hoedt
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Madison Sieg
51%
(
57 of
111)
1st Serve %
79%
(
75 of
95)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
49 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Brengle Vs Sieg Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Brengle are available here and Sieg photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Madison Sieg
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
